The Only Two Climate Investment Criteria that Matter

Originally published on Radical on 2024-09-04. Whether you’re investing your time or your money (or someone else’s money) in impact work designed to address, mitigate, or reverse climate change there are really only two criteria that matter in terms of making a meaningful impact: Everything else is largely greenwashing, a red herring, or mere incrementalism.

The Only Two Climate Investment Criteria that Matter Read More »

Climate Tech’s New Monsantos: Upgrading Nature and Downgrading Humans

Originally published on Radical on 2024-07-18. A growing sector of climate tech and green investments is concerned with what can best be described as “upgrading nature”. Things like ‘better’ insects, ‘improved’ trees, ‘enhanced’ wood, ‘supercharged’ vegetables, ‘superior’ algae, ‘more efficient’ cows. The separation of humans and nature, known as dualism, which is a key enabler of capitalism’s exploitative relationship with the

Climate Tech’s New Monsantos: Upgrading Nature and Downgrading Humans Read More »

The Subversion of the Climate Performance Potential Thesis

Originally published on Radical on 2024-06-28. Climate Performance Potential, or variants thereof, is the “in” term for measuring the investability of a climate startup. Although there is no standard or agreed upon way of measuring this almost every climate tech investor has some version of this metric at play in making investment decisions. The measure

The Subversion of the Climate Performance Potential Thesis Read More »

Composting Capital

Originally published on Radical on 2024-06-21. We need to invest less and compost more to start harvesting meaningful climate outcomes. Financial investments into startups, including climate tech startups, expect a one-to-one return. Of course in terms of quantity they expect a one-to-many return but I’m referring to the kind of return: investing Euros should return Euros. Investors put money into a

Composting Capital Read More »